AboutSR&ED in the News

History of Innovation in the Federal Budget Part 1: 1995 – 2001

Reference Article (>5 Years Old)
Please note that the information herein may be outdated, links could be inactive, and policies discussed may have evolved. For the most current data, consult our latest publications. If you would like us to refresh this article as it is of interest to you, please contact us.

R&D and Innovation in the Federal Budget

Innovation in federal budgets from 1995 to 2001 focused on research initiatives.

We take a look back at research and development (R&D) and innovation in past federal budgets since 1995. The 1995 – 2001 period saw federal budgets that strongly supported greater research initiatives, skills development, and the role of the Internet in innovation, among other things.

A comprehensive overview of how SR&ED features in each federal budget since 1995 is also available on our SR&ED in Federal Budget (Summaries) page.

1995 Federal Budget

Liberal Party

The Liberal Party’s 1995 federal budget aimed to concentrate on strategic actions that would foster “innovation, rapid commercialization and value-added production.” The Party pointed to the Medical Research Council as an example of a federally-supported body that formed a partnership with the academic science community in order to create successfully marketed products and support job creation.

Despite pushing for continued progress, the Party also recognized the influence of popular opinion:1

Constant renewal is what this country is all about. Indeed, it is the essential ingredient of a dynamic federalism.

The inter-play between the federal government and the provinces has led to remarkable innovation and experimentation.

But, as we act to reform government and restore responsibility to our finances, there are those who would argue that this country, this federation, cannot change that Canada is about the status quo.

1996 Federal Budget

Liberal Party

The Liberal Party’s 1996 federal budget called for increased investment in Canadian technology and innovation to the tune of a $270 million reallocation from budget savings. In addition, the budget outlined the creation, expansion of, and/or increased support of the following:2

  • Technology Partnerships Canada (no longer in existence): Fund to grow from ~$150 million to ~$250 million to “encourage partnership and risk sharing with the private sector and to leverage investment in the development and commercialization of high technology products and processes.”3
  • Business Development Bank:4 “New equity capital of $50 million will be injected into […] to increase its lending efforts in strategic growth sectors, such as new technology.”
  • SchoolNet Program:5 Every Canadian school and library to be connected to the Internet by 1998, including those in rural communities.
  • Information Highway:6 “Ministers of Industry and Canadian Heritage will be introducing policies and reforms to facilitate greater reliance on the marketplace while respecting the commitment to affordable access and to a Canadian presence on the information highway.”

1997 Federal Budget

Liberal Party

Repeating the 1996 emphasis on investment in Canadian innovation, the Liberal Party announced the establishment of the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI).7 The Party promised the CFI an $800 million contribution to support research infrastructure in the areas of health, the environment, as well as science and engineering. This contribution was to be utilized by universities, colleges and hospitals.8

1998 Federal Budget

Liberal Party

Much of the 1998 federal budget focused on the Canadian Opportunities Strategy,9 which had only a small mention of support for the innovative research infrastructures mentioned in the previous year’s budget:10

Effective in 1998-99, the government will increase financial support to the three granting councils — the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, the Medical Research Council and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council — to provide research grants, scholarships and fellowships for advanced research and graduate students.”

1999 Federal Budget

Liberal Party

With the 21st century looming, Finance Minister Martin stressed the value of access to education granted by the Canadian Opportunities Strategy, directly equating education with innovation:11

Innovation and knowledge are two sides of the same coin–the true hard currency of the future, the sources of sustained growth.

2000 Federal Budget

Liberal Party

The 2000 federal budget proposed innovative initiatives, to be put in place between 1999 – 2003, totalling $4.1 billion to:12

  • Promote leading-edge research and innovation in universities, research hospitals and the private sector;
  • Develop new environmental technologies and improve environmental practices;  and
  • Strengthen federal, provincial and municipal infrastructure.

In addition, the budget stressed the innovative potential in Atlantic Canada’s technological industries while also restating the importance of supporting research and the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

2001 Federal Budget

Liberal Party

The total estimated government expenditures on science and technology were $7.4 billion in 2001 – 2002, to be used toward skill development/upgrading, education, and research. Specifically, the budget aimed to support activities including the following:13

  • helping offset indirect research costs at universities and research hospitals;
  • supporting leading-edge technologies and expanding regional innovation initiatives across the country through increased funding to the National Research Council of Canada;14
  • providing additional funding to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council.

 

 

A comprehensive overview of how SR&ED features in each federal budget since 1995 is available on our SR&ED in Federal Budget (Summaries) page.

 

How do you think the Liberal Party’s 1995 – 2001 innovation platforms compare against the current government’s platform?

Connect With Us! 

Share your thoughts by commenting below or joining the conversation on our LinkedIn page, Facebook page, or via Twitter. 

Show 14 footnotes

  1. Minister of Finance. (February 27, 1995.) Budget Speech. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/webarchives/20071123114126/http://www.fin.gc.ca/budget95/speech/speeche.txt.
  2. Minister of Finance. (March 6, 1996.) Budget in Brief. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.budget.canada.ca/pdfarch/budget96/binb/brief.pdf.
  3. Government of Canada. (February 10, 2009.) Technology Partnerships Canada Program. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: http://ito.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ito-oti.nsf/eng/h_00154.html.
  4. Business Development Bank of Canada. (n.d.) (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: https://www.bdc.ca/en/pages/home.aspx.
  5. Industry Canada. (n.d.) SchoolNet. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: http://archives.studentscommission.ca/enviro/ag22_e.html.
  6. Government of Canada. (April 3, 2013.) Canada’s information highway: building Canada’s information and communications infrastructure: providing new dimensions for learning, creativity and entrepreneurship. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/46638/publication.html.
  7. Canadian Foundation for Innovation. (2017.) (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: https://www.innovation.ca/.
  8. Minister of Finance. (February 18, 1997.) Budget Speech. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.budget.canada.ca/pdfarch/budget97/binb/bp/bp97e.pdf.
  9. Minister of Finance. (February 24, 1998.) Budget in Brief – The Canadian Opportunities Strategy. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: http://www.fin.gc.ca/budget98/binb/binb2-eng.asp#opportunities.
  10. Minister of Finance. (February 24, 1998.) Budget in Brief. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: http://www.fin.gc.ca/budget98/binb/binb-eng.asp.
  11. Finance Minister. (February 16, 1999.) The Budget Speech 1999. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.budget.canada.ca/pdfarch/budget99/binb/binbe.pdf.
  12. Minister of Finance. (February 28, 2000.) Budget in Brief. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: http://www.fin.gc.ca/budget00/brief/brief1-eng.asp#toc.
  13. Department of Finance Canada. (2001.) The Budget in Brief 2001. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.budget.canada.ca/pdfarch/budget01/pdf/briefe.pdf.
  14. Government of Canada. (August 18, 2017.) National Research Council of Canada. (Accessed: August 21, 2017.) Retrieved from: https://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/index.html.

Elizabeth Lance

Elizabeth is known as the "SR&ED Maven" in the industry. With a love of documentation and the nuances of language, she is often engaged by multi-million dollar companies to help improve documentation and workflow processes. Her favourite sentence (which she hears regularly) is "Accepted as Filed". Find out more about her on LinkedIn.

Leave a Reply