Landmark SR&ED Ruling: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. v. The Queen (1998)

Published by Elizabeth Lance on

We would love to show you more, but this content is for members only. Please login to view this content. Register here.
Categories: HistoryTax Court of Canada Rulings
Tags:

Elizabeth Lance

Elizabeth is known as the "SR&ED Maven" in the industry. With a love of documentation and the nuances of language, she is often engaged by multi-million dollar companies to help improve documentation and workflow processes. Her favourite sentence (which she hears regularly) is "Accepted as Filed". Find out more about her on LinkedIn.

1 Comment

Comments are closed.

Related Posts

SR&ED in Canada - Another Review
Changes

Is SR&ED Going To Change – Again? (2019)

The last time that a major report came out offering recommendations to the SR&ED program, the effect was profound. In 2011, Innovation Canada: A Call to Action – colloquially known as the Jenkins Report was Read more…

Five Questions - SR&ED
About

When SR&ED Was a Tax Shelter Scheme

During the late 1980s and early 1990s, a dubious practice emerged whereby some Canadian corporations established general partnerships with other companies as a means of obtaining scientific research and experimental development (SR&ED) investment tax credits Read more…

Financing

SR&ED Program Funding: A program in decline? Our predictions vs. reality.

SR&ED Education and Resources analyzed what was published regarding annual SR&ED spend by the federal governments in the CRA’s Reports to Parliament and Departmental Performance Reports. What were the results? In prior reports, we analyzed the Read more…

error: This content is Copyright InGenuity Group Solutions Inc. Please contact the site administrator if you wish to use this content.
%d bloggers like this: