Missing the Mark with SR&ED

Technology-based companies may have a hard time discerning between their technology and the knowledge base that enables their technology – after all, a company’s knowledge base is technical in nature. However, a business needs to distinguish between the functionality of an innovation (what it does) as opposed to the knowledge that supports the implementation of the functionality (how it does it) when applying for SR&ED.

In this post, we discuss why this is important. Namely, the CRA looks at your knowledge base and if you have advanced it to determine whether the work performed qualifies for SR&ED. The CRA also expects you to have the necessary resources to perform the work, as it also points out in its Eligibility of Work for SR&ED Investment Tax Credits Policy, “It is expected that any company making a claim for SR&ED will have or will access the expertise necessary to carry out that work.” 1

Defining the Knowledge Base 

According to the CRA, the scientific or technological knowledge base refers to “the existing level of technology and scientific knowledge [known to the company], and consists of the knowledge of the resources within the company and sources available publicly.”2

IMPORTANT: The company is expected to have information that is commonly known within its specific area of science or technology at the time that the work is performed. The CRA differentiates between learning – the acquisition of pre-existing knowledge – and an advancement (as above). Ensure that you demonstrate your competence to the CRA and explain how the new knowledge generated exceeds the publicly available knowledge.

According to the CRA, the resources as part of the knowledge base within the company can include:

  • technical knowledge, education, training, and experience of its personnel; and
  • its technical capabilities typified by its current products, techniques, practices, and methodologies (for example, trade secrets and intellectual property).

Publicly available sources generally include scientific papers, journals, textbooks, and internet-based information sources as well as expertise accessible to the company (for example, through recruiting employees or hiring consultants or contractors). 3

Scientific or Technological Advancement

What the CRA is looking for is if science or technology has been advanced through new knowledge discovered during the work that is being considered for an SR&ED tax credit. According to the SR&ED Glossary, scientific or technological advancement is defined as “the generation of information or the discovery of knowledge that advances the understanding of scientific relations or technology. This definition encompasses the definition of scientific advancement, advancement of scientific knowledge and technological advancement. The only difference is that scientific advancement and advancement of scientific knowledge relate to science whereas technological advancement relates to technology.”4

Scientific or Technological Uncertainty

Work for scientific knowledge or technological advancement is also meant to resolve a more nebulous concept known as a scientific or technological uncertainty to determine if there is SR&ED in a project being considered for the tax incentive. Again, this involves an advancement of knowledge. The SR&ED Glossary defines this concept as “whether a given result or objective can be achieved or how to achieve it is not known or determined on the basis of generally available scientific or technological knowledge or experience. This definition encompasses the definition of scientific uncertainty, technological uncertainty, and technological obstacle.“5

Put another way, the advancement of knowledge comes out of the performed work while the uncertainty is what the impetus of the work is for.

Types of Research

The CRA identifies three types of research:

  • Basic research;
  • Applied research; and
  • Experimental development.

Basic Research. The CRA’s Eligibility of Work for SR&ED Investment Tax Credits Policy notes that “basic research” is as follows: 

Basic research is work undertaken for the advancement of scientific knowledge without a specific practical application in view. It is usually carried out in a laboratory setting. Claims involving basic research sometimes include third-party payments to, for example, universities, research institutes, and consortia.6 

Applied research is defined as follows: 

[This] is also work undertaken for the advancement of scientific knowledge, but with a specific practical application in view.7 

Experimental development is described as follows:

… work undertaken for the purpose of achieving technological advancement for the purpose of creating new, or improving existing, materials, devices, products, or processes, including incremental improvements.8

Explaining New Knowledge 

How do you explain to the CRA that your work advances your company’s scientific or technological knowledge base? As an example, if you wanted to build a chemical processing system, you would need to understand the underlying properties of the chemicals being processed as well as the mechanical constraints of the machinery used. The latter is your knowledge base. This could be described as thus:  

Objective: “To improve our chemical processing system, such that we can increase throughput from 5 L/hr to 10 L/hr.”
Knowledge (correct): “Through experimentation, we developed new knowledge that enabled us to meet our objective of processing chemicals at 10 L/hr. This included determining the optimal processing temperatures of chemicals commonly used in paint manufacturing environments, which was identified as 45’C (+/- 5’C). Temperatures above this point (>50’C) led to early mechanical failures; temperatures below this point (<40’C) resulted in sluggish behaviour, slowing the processing time by 25-30%. This information was not available in previously published literature and could only be obtained through experimentation.”
Functionality (incorrect): “We can now process chemicals commonly found in paint manufacturing environments at a speed of 10 L/hr.”

This example clearly shows the process that led your company to build on its knowledge as opposed to merely stating the functionality you developed. The former is what information the CRA seeks from your firm in terms of expanding its knowledge base, while the latter example may lead the CRA to request more information – increasing the length of time between starting your research and obtaining your SR&ED tax credit and increasing your risk of review/denial.

Summary

In order to qualify for SR&ED, your company’s work has to pursue one of the three types of research the CRA has outlined and explain how that research contributed to your firm’s knowledge base. It is not enough to merely state the features or functionality of your innovation – you need to clearly articulate what you learned when you were developing (or were trying to develop, but failed) this innovation. The CRA is not looking for how that knowledge supported the current project your company is using to apply for an SR&ED tax claim, but how it will impact future ones due to your research discoveries.  

Do you have experience defining your knowledge base for the CRA in SR&ED applications? 

Share your insight or opinions by commenting below or adding to the conversation on our LinkedIn group, Facebook page or Twitter.

For more information about SR&ED, sign up for our Comprehensive Guide to SR&ED!

Show 8 footnotes

  1. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. Eligibility of Work for SR&ED Investment Tax Credits Policy. 2015, April 24. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/eligibility-work-investment-tax-credits.html#s1_2.
  2. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. Eligibility of Work for SR&ED Investment Tax Credits Policy. 2015, April 24. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/eligibility-work-investment-tax-credits.html#s1_2.
  3. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. SR&ED Glossary. 2017, March 30. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/glossary.html
  4. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. SR&ED Glossary. 2017, March 30. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/glossary.html
  5. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. SR&ED Glossary. 2017, March 30. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/glossary.html
  6. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. Eligibility of Work for SR&ED Investment Tax Credits Policy. 2015, April 24. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/eligibility-work-investment-tax-credits.html#s1_2.
  7. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. Eligibility of Work for SR&ED Investment Tax Credits Policy. 2015, April 24. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/eligibility-work-investment-tax-credits.html#s1_2.
  8. Government of Canada. Canada Revenue Agency. Eligibility of Work for SR&ED Investment Tax Credits Policy. 2015, April 24. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/scientific-research-experimental-development-tax-incentive-program/eligibility-work-investment-tax-credits.html#s1_2.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *